I loved when he said "We're here to talk about love for God, and we don't need violence. But we'll meet violence with violence".
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
Dharma himsa tathaiva cha"
Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.
@mrsbenedictcumberbatch9565 woa the Ego! 😂 🙏
I am not trying to put you down nor am I angry. You sentence made it appear that you weren't clear enough. So I added my points. But you take it like a fight to win when we are on same side as you told.
If you see others reply "he probably meant we must unite as Hindus", it shows that others also misinterpreted what you meant.
More than 2 ppl have "misinterpreted" what you said. One more guy tagged you and talked about Brahmkns, Kshatrias.
I loved when he said "We're here to talk about love for God, and we don't need violence. But we'll meet violence with violence".
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
Dharma himsa tathaiva cha"
Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.
@mrsbenedictcumberbatch9565 it's either that or you are not clear enough yourselves.
Limitation of language.. see you replied to first comment which talked about violence and Dharma.. And you replied that you disagree and violence is not for mere difference in opinion (implying you may not have understood word Dharma. ) . So I told you he is not talking about mere disagreements. He is talking about righteousness.
Then you told they are brahman not kshatriyas, implying kshatriyas are not spiritual?
So tell me how I am wrong. Be more clear instead of telling others are not understanding.
Understanding goes both ways. A good speaker, a good listener. A listener cannot blame speaker all the time and vice versa. This is how communication should work.
I loved when he said "We're here to talk about love for God, and we don't need violence. But we'll meet violence with violence".
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
Dharma himsa tathaiva cha"
Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.
@mrsbenedictcumberbatch9565 in reply to you first comment.. Spiritually is not restricted to one among 4 varnas . Everybody can be spiritual whlie doing thier dharma.. Absence or presence of violence to protect righteousness or defend doesn't expel them from spirituality (eg Mahabharat war)
I loved when he said "We're here to talk about love for God, and we don't need violence. But we'll meet violence with violence".
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
Dharma himsa tathaiva cha"
Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.
@mrsbenedictcumberbatch9565 Dharma means righteousness.. Not religion. Violence for Righteousness doesn't mean disagreement. It very rare that violence is righteous. So it's not a go ahead for unnecessary violence arising out of limitations of human beings .
Login
Share videos, music and pictures, follow friends and keep track of what you enjoy!
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
Dharma himsa tathaiva cha"
Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.
Go ahead.. Others will read and understand if not you.. Why should your singular opinion matter to me.😂
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
Dharma himsa tathaiva cha"
Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.
I am not trying to put you down nor am I angry. You sentence made it appear that you weren't clear enough. So I added my points. But you take it like a fight to win when we are on same side as you told.
If you see others reply "he probably meant we must unite as Hindus", it shows that others also misinterpreted what you meant.
More than 2 ppl have "misinterpreted" what you said. One more guy tagged you and talked about Brahmkns, Kshatrias.
So still think every one else is dumb but you?
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
Dharma himsa tathaiva cha"
Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.
Limitation of language.. see you replied to first comment which talked about violence and Dharma.. And you replied that you disagree and violence is not for mere difference in opinion (implying you may not have understood word Dharma. ) . So I told you he is not talking about mere disagreements. He is talking about righteousness.
Then you told they are brahman not kshatriyas, implying kshatriyas are not spiritual?
So tell me how I am wrong. Be more clear instead of telling others are not understanding.
Understanding goes both ways. A good speaker, a good listener. A listener cannot blame speaker all the time and vice versa. This is how communication should work.
Arrogance in a decent discussion is not good..
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
Dharma himsa tathaiva cha"
Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharma
Dharma himsa tathaiva cha"
Non-violence is the ultimate dharma. So too is violence in service of Dharma.