Vishnugupt

@jaydutta7711 It is an established fact. Geeta was added later by Vyaas rishi in Mahabharat. If avataars happened when dharm was in sankat, when innocents were killed then why no Avataars after Krishna? Did Ishwar left his job? Everybody knows people are killed daily to justify someone's version of supreme power. Where is the latest Avataar?

People who have read Vedas and shastr, who have done Brahmacharya and have succeeded in Kundalini jagriti are not mere humans, they are on an elevated dimension. You can call them superhuman but equating them with Ishwar is sheer ignorance of Vedic knowledge. Purans have single handedly destroyed Vedic Sanatan Dharm, made superstition rampant, immersed society in foolish rituals and worst, the audacity to equate human with his creator.

@jaydutta7711 Do yourself a favour, try consulting Vedas, Upnishads, Darshans and other shastras. Then answer why Shivji's stories only mentioned in Shiv Puran and not in ANY of our shastras? Purans are not shastra. Sooner we realise this, sooner we can turn to Vedic knowledge.

@jaydutta7711 Bhagvat Puran is a collection of memories, just like thia comment section. Many erratic things are in Puranas but that doesn't mean they all are false or true. Bhagvat Puran has multiple versions of who Radha really was. Read the Puran first, don't paste what you think.

@jaydutta7711 Niether have you read Geeta nor Bible. Otherwise you wouldn't say Jesus was a kind man. One who created racial divisions, lead to slavery, exhorted to vanquish non believers was a good man? What drugs you are on?

@jaydutta7711 Yogeshwar means one who has joined with ishwar, not one becomes Ishwar. Ishwar never dies, never stops creation and destruction. Did Shri Krishna do that? Maharshi Vyaas added Bhagvad Geeta in Mahabharata after it's creation. Srop confusing Mahapurush with Ishwar.

@kiransdolly Limited period offer!! Quote the shloka with dalits and get free rice for life.

@kiransdolly What in the name of Jesus is Gorakhpur script? Did Jesus use that script. People who follow a child without a father as God should not make bold statements. Anyhow world is waking up to tge reality that Christ and all his story is a completely fake with no historical references and archaeology. All the Krishna stories you mentioned are just stories which is why I make fun of the idiots like Iscon who believe them.

@maxnuccio2440 Really? Geeta is part of Mahabharat which has about lakh shloks. Not even once Radha is mentioned. Radha is pauranic fabrication. Yogeshwar Krishan can never be what Iscon describes him as. Now they have fabricated Geeta too, bunch of conman agyanis.

@kiransdolly Ha ha ha! Stupid missionary propaganda. No such thing at all in Mahabharat. Stop reading vatican version😁

@kiransdolly Funny. I read it too! Any shlok of any adhyay which made you opinion?

@kiransdolly Really? How did you arrive at this conclusion about Geeta?

Dd Gg Then who gave Prabhupada this authority?

@RGR1602 What do you mean by Vedic? Veds are apaurushya but were gathered from universe by 4 mantradrishta rishis Agni Vayu Aditya and Angira.

@RGR1602 And where did I say this?

@RGR1602 What? Krishna and Rukmani appear in Mahabharat. And Geeta is part of mahabharat, I hope you know that. There is no mention of Krishna and Ram in Vedas because these texts existed before them. That is the whole reason for studying the supreme texts called the chaturved. I don't what new story Iscon has concocted about the chronology but I did not contradict myself.

@RGR1602 Where there is crowd, doesn't guarantee presence of truth.

Those times were not so bad still Ishwar came in Krishna's form acc. to you. Then why doesn't he manifests himself now when avataar is needed more than ever? People are fighting in proving whose God is greatest, shouldn't he come and settle this debate and stop the terrorism?

All these illogical and unscientific acts of Krishna can only be found in Purans. There so much corruption in purans that they themselves are not sure who actually wrote them. They are a blot on the excellence of Vedic knowledge. They have completely distorted the idea of Ishwar. Krishna was Brahmachari till 42 and he married Rukmani after that and she was his one and only wife. Concocting tales of him enticing women and having many wives is probably the biggest insult to the character of Krishna. Read the Krishna of Geeta and that of Purans, any logical person would arrive at a conclusion that they bothvare distinctly different. But final decision lies with the individual on what choice he makes.

@RGR1602 Arey bhai Even Raam Rahim made people his die hard followers. This actually stems from the civilizational value that we are truth seekers and need a guru to guide us. The only and big problem remains is we never read the original texts ourselves which turns us docile and wenever question what is being taught by these self appointed gurus. Iscon has become a missionary organisation and its shallowness is evident from the negligible following it has in Bharat. They can't answer a basic question like if Krishna was Ishwar then why he had to study Ved and Vedang in Rishi Panini's ashram? Couldn't he have shown his maaya in front of guru by explaining the knowledge of Vedas before even studying it? Also nobody can singularly qoute the reference of Radha from any of the Purans. It is amazing that a man credited as Yogeshwar could've been doing raas leela with maidens. Why would Arjun take updesh from a man whose character was doubtful? Also ZERO mention of Radha in Mahabharat.

@RGR1602 To understand ved how it is meant to be is first by learning six Vedang so that there is no error in understanding the mantr of various mandals. Best commentary after that is Brahman granths like Aitray, Shatpath, Taitrey, Gopath etc. Even more broken down is Upanishads 118 total but majority lost.

Puranas are hisroric texts but don't have integrity. They have been mixed and corrupted far too much. Some of the pauranic texts are completely idiotic.

But anybody who doesn't want to dedicate whole life in trying to decode Ved can easily get the gist in Bagvad Geeta. Only problem is Iscon has twisted Geeta so much in their translations that true message is completely lost on them. Geeta press Gorakhpur version is still a very credible tranlation of Geeta.

@RGR1602 Then how would you understand ved? Sanskrit person can easily understand Hindi.

@RGR1602 Although I haven't read ved but I know that understanding of Ishwar, yajy and upasna is compiled in Yajurved. But this video sums it up more or less-https://youtu.be/yS3r3en0qn8